Friday 26 January 2018

Give me your healthy, your educated, job offer in hand

"Welcome!" With open arms, German Chancellor Angela Merkel ushered in one million Syrian refugees in 2015. A country notorious for its Holocaust horrors became a beacon to the world's dispossessedShe embodied, with no small irony, the words that adorn the Statue of Liberty: "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free." 
It was all so refreshing. But it was not to last. 
Fast-forward two years, and our compassionate hero of the free world is fighting for her political life. Her primary rival: a right-wing insurgency birthed by her act of compassion. 
similar backlash is playing out across the Western world. Xenophobic forces are growing in France, Denmark, the UK and U.S.
Everywhere (so it seems) except in Canada. With one of the highest percentages of foreign-born residents in the Western world (approaching 22%), Canada is an island when it comes to our positive views of newcomers.
This makes it difficult for us to relate. We're dumbfounded by the situation in the U.S. where so-called Dreamers, many of whom don't speak the language of their home country, will soon be at risk of deportation. 
As a Canadian, I would like to smugly say, "You xenophobic infidels! Why can't you be more welcoming like us?" 
That would be smug. Too smug. There's more than one reason for our difference in views, of course, and racism may play a role. But in light of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, can we claim we're less racist? The truth is that Canada has a different starting point when it comes to immigration. Partly due to our system, and partly due to geography.  
While the American system focuses more on family reunification, Canada has targeted economic migrants since 1967Half of new immigrants to Canada have a bachelor's degree and most require a job offer to immigrate. 
On a personal level, I detest this system. We've been on an immigration journey with our nephew from Ukraine for the last four yearsThe process is lengthy, costly, and full of bureaucratic red tape
But it certainly weeds out the less motivated. This grueling system could be why we, as Canadians, have such a positive view of immigrants. They don't take away jobs, they fill job vacancies. They are our doctors, our tradespeople and our scientists. They add to our diversity, but most of all, they spur economic growth 
There isn't the same socio-economic divide that exists in many countries. Most immigrants I know live in better neighbourhoods than I do! (Full disclosure: I'm married to an immigrant, so I guess we're a half-immigrant family.)
Our geography helps, too. We share a border with only one country and it's a world superpower. Rarely do we speak of border security - we're more prone to complain about too much than too little. 
Only recently have we begun to experience a challenge similar to that of the U.S. and Europe: an inflow of refugees through a porous border. Although they're still relatively small, these numbers will likely increase.
How will we react? With compassion and open arms?
Every nation has their limits. While we may think we stand on higher moral ground, Canada is equally susceptible to intolerance. 

Saturday 20 January 2018

Somewhat wise words from an older guy

I was called an old person this week. First time ever. A 16-year-old punk called his dad and me "old people." 
I'm not offended. It was inadvertent. The little twerp actually said: "I guess that's the way old people play."  
While he was being schooled by two 40-somethings in badminton, he felt the need to critique his elders. 
It's normal. I don't hold it against him. It's natural to think you know everything at the age of 16. But calling me old at the tender age of 40? I barely graduated from high school! 
Last year my daughter described two people in a car, calling them "old people." But she clarified: "You know, Baby Boomers." This I can understand. At the age of retirement, at the cusp of senior citizenship, one can safely be called old. But not at the peak of one's adult life (yes, everything's downhill from here). 
I don't deny that I'm olderI've come to terms, for instance, with being called a "host Dad" by the 20-year-old university students who board with us. And as I've mentioned beforethere's clearly a difference in our interests and understanding of the world – a generational difference, if you will. 
I've been rather critical of this younger generation in my past couple blogs – probably too criticalThere's a tendency for us older people to harp on the young folks. 
The fact is, I like young people. Even the 16-year-old child whom I beat regularly in badminton. Normally, he's an extremely pleasant and considerate human being. The students who board with us are also polite and respectful. Part of it could be Japanese culture, but I've see it in our youth, too. 
In fact, I would say Canadian/American youth are becoming more Japanese-like in their behaviourThey're less rebellious than past generations: they drink less, smoke less, and have less casual sex. Is this a bad thing? Sure, they might live with their parents until they're 30, but at least they get along with them! 
Baby Boomers, by contrast, were in all-out rebellion with their parents and the world. Who can blame them? In the U.S., they were being sent to fight in the jungles of Vietnam! And they lived with parents who acted like, well, parents of the 1960s. 
A comedian joked that parents of the '60s promised their kids nothing, and if they dared ask for something, they got a beating. Today we promise our kids everything. We're "pony parents" – if our kids want one, we'll try our darndest to get it for them. It's why they want to live at home for so long – not to mention the lifetime of free food and accommodations. 
But again, it's not all badThe Economist reports that today's parents spend twice as much time with their kids than 50 years ago. For fathers, it's even more: 16 minutes in 1965 compared to 59 minutes in 2012. Almost four times! The benefits are proven: children are healthier, smarter, and better behaved when fathers are actively involved in their lives. 
Yes, some kids are coddled to the point that they could be inhibitedThe author of iGen fears that kids are no longer prepared for the real worldThere may be some truth to this. But maybe they're also less resentful, more secure, and less prone to living a miserable life.  
Just a theory. 
From an older guy.