Saturday, 16 November 2024

Moral arc may bend but will not break

  

Martin Luther King Jr. once famously said, “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.” For the last century, at least, this seems to have been the case. And, being a somewhat hopeful person, I think it can continue.  

We can continue to improve human rights, promote gender equality and protect our planet before we hurt our most vulnerable or, worst-case scenario, destroy the world we live in.  

As bad as things sometimes sound, the progress we have made is astounding. It may not feel as significant in the Western world – we may have even taken a step back after the pandemic – but other countries are advancing quickly. Gay marriage is becoming more acceptable across the world; more and more countries are addressing climate change; and women's rights are increasing globally, despite the fact that a man who ran on protecting women “whether they like or not” will re-enter the White House. 

As King noted, the arc of the moral universe is long – as in, it can take a long time to rectify long-standing social issues. We will have setbacks. As we saw in the U.S., economic disruptions like inflation can go a long way to elect autocratic leaders where the public still desires a strongman, not a strong woman. But rest assured, future female presidents (and prime ministers) are inevitable. 

When it comes to gender equality, I would argue we are still world leaders, despite America’s refusal to elect a female president and despite Canada’s refusal to elect a woman to lead one of its major political parties (yes, I’m talking to you, Canada – you thought you could get off so easily??) Other than the Nordic countries, where women outperform men on almost every metric including kick boxing (I’m speculating here), our countries give women more opportunities in leadership than perhaps anywhere else in the world. Never mind that Canada and the U.S. are ranked 30th and 44th in the 2023 Global Gender Gap Index.... I’m not sure how much faith I have in this ranking, as Switzerland is ranked 21st. 

My sister-in-law speaks from first-hand experience. After visiting her sister’s family in Switzerland, she was surprised by the gender hierarchy that existed in this part of Europe. Her sister works in the financial sector, a male-dominated workplace where women aren't offered the same respect or opportunities. In large part, says her sister, women are valued more as child-bearing homemakers than professionals in the workforce. To offer some perspective, one region of Switzerland granted women the right to vote only in 1990! This surprised me. Here I thought Europeans were so progressive and Ooh-la-la! Look at us and all our equality you backward, barbaric North Americans! Based on her experience, this may not be the case. [As a side note, these countries may offer better maternity and social benefits for women than Canada and the U.S. which might place well on measures of gender equality, but it doesn’t mean that attitudes towards women have changed or that women are accepted as equals in the workplace.]

Then there’s Russia... A country headed back into the dark ages when it comes to women’s rights. Recently, President Vladimir Putin banned “child-free propaganda” in his country because he worries that women are having too few children (the same concern has been voiced by vice president-elect JD Vance). The Kremlin now promotes TV shows that show happy women with many children. They’ve offered financial incentives to women who have at least 10 kids, they've restricted abortion and are now encouraging child birth to begin at the age of 19. 

Setting Russia aside – a federation (the former USSR) that incidentally promoted gender equality much earlier than most Western countries – based on world trends, women’s rights will continue to improve. Despite some setbacks, more women than ever before are in higher education (outnumbering men) and are earning higher incomes. They are less prone to addiction than men and are involved in far less crime. For these and other reasons, their average lifespan is a full six years longer than men in the U.S. and four years longer in Canada. In other words, on average, they have a much better chance at success in today’s society than ever before. (This also says something about boys and men in our society, but we'll deal with that another day.) 

America was as close as ever to having two women running against one another to become the U.S. president. Twice in the last eight years, Americans almost elected a woman president. That says something.

Canada, on the other hand, is starting to look like a 1930s backwater with its lack of federal female leaders. What would a modern-day feminist version of Martin Luther King Jr. have to say about his northern neighbour? Eh?!


Saturday, 9 November 2024

I blame Biden

 

Someone has to take the fall. Whether you lose by one vote or three million, someone clearly didn’t do enough to win. 

So who’s responsible? I’m not one to point fingers, but since you asked, I place the blame squarely on Joseph Robinette Biden (yes, that is his middle name). 

It’s so obvious now that the election is over. How else could Democrats lose to an autocratic, mysoginistic, somewhat incoherent 78-year-old man? 

I ask you: Who didn’t bow out of the race until he absolutely had to? Biden! 

Who proposed Kamala Harris to be the only candidate for consideration? Biden! 

Who caused runaway inflation? Biden!! (Although I don’t really believe this, a case can be made!) 

I don’t blame Harris. She worked with what she had. Let’s be honest, she was appointed as vice president, then appointed as presidential candidate. She may not have been the best, but she was a good candidate with little time to prove her credentials to the American public. By entering the race, she immediately elevated Democrats' chances of winning. With Biden, they were expected to lose in a landslide. Instead, they almost won. 

But they still lost. A big loss, considering Democrats are also projected to lose Congress. A monumental loss, considering Donald Trump won’t have the same guardrails he did in his first presidency. He knows exactly who he wants to appoint and who he wants to prosecute. It’s a dangerous time for many Americans. 

Biden, like many politicians before him, let his ego get in the way of clear thinking. He thought only he could stop Trump, even though all polling showed otherwise. Doesn't he know a big ego only works for quasi-billionaires who build their persona through reality TV?

Democrats were in a bind from the beginning, but with Trump as the Republican nominee, they at least had a chance. In the end, it likely came down to the economy. Inflation and high interest rates made almost all Americans mad, but particularly those of the lower middle class, where every penny counts. These traditional Democrat voters, including many young people, were more than willing to roll the dice on another Trump presidency – tariffs and all!

Biden will ride off into the sunset as an elder statesman who got what he always wanted – the presidency. After a storied career, one that involved tragedy and self-inflicted setbacks, he too was appointed to a great position of power under Barack Obama. Then, despite a dismal performance in the 2020 Democratic race, he was anointed the winner by some powerful voices in his party. At that time, he turned out to be a good choice. But only for a time. 

While he accomplished many things, he fell victim to an economic reality that was larger than any administration. He also fell victim to father time much sooner than he would have liked. No one likes to be told they’re too old to do anything, but he clearly was. That realization came much too late. 

And so another old man will take over to serve his term – not behind bars as once thought, but behind the Resolute Desk of the Oval Office. 

At least we hope it's one term. Because, as we know, dictators can live for a very long time.