Strange
things happen when reading about spacetime. Time slows down. It takes five
minutes to read one page. Sometimes it goes backwards. I reread and reread, to
no avail. Then... time stops. I'm only halfway through On the Origin of
Time: Stephen Hawking’s Final Theory, and Newton's first law of inertia has
prevented me from going any further. After three long Earth months, I’ve
returned it to the library... for the second time. Honestly, has anyone ever
finished it?
Let’s sum up the first half, because that’s all you’ll ever get.
Time is relative.
Old news, right? Well, it still gets me every time. How can people who live on
mountains experience time faster than those at sea level? To put it
scientifically, that’s bonkers.
The
closer you are to a large mass, the slower time goes by relative to others. If
you get too close to a black hole, so massive that not even light can escape,
your kids will grow up and become older than you in a matter of minutes. That’s
what happened to Matthew McConaughey in the movie Interstellar, and it nearly
broke him. If you watched it, you’ll know: he cried a lot.
Sometimes
it’s better not to know how spacetime works because, for the most part, we will
never experience it. The time distortions we experience are too insignificant.
We’re talking milli-milliseconds (yes, that’s my term).
We
will most definitely never travel at the speed of light or even close to it.
But let’s just say you could. Travelling at the fastest speed in the universe
(it cannot be surpassed because Einstein said so), it would take over four
years to reach the nearest star. And, yes, time would again slow down. As my
grade nine science teacher relayed with perspiration rolling down his brow: “If
you were to travel the speed of light away from the earth for a month and then
return, the earth would have aged 1,000 years!!” Something like that. It
theoretically makes time travel possible, but only if you plan to jump to the
future.
While
travelling at the speed of light, which is impossible given our mass, time
would in fact stop. You’ve traded distance completely for time. Don’t ask me how
it works. It's a trade-off: the faster you travel, the less you age.
This
is Einstein’s theory of relativity in a nutshell. Very unintuitive. He broke
Newtonian physics... and my mind.
Yet
he didn’t know it all. Back in 1915, when he broke the news that your feet age
slower than your head, he thought the universe was static. It was a Belgian
Catholic priest named Georges Lemaitre who in 1927 proposed that the universe was
in fact expanding. Both Einstein and Arthur Eddington, the man who helped prove
Einstein's theory of relativity, poo-pooed the theory of this religious man
and, in the end, were proven wrong.
That’s
right, a Catholic priest was more open to the idea of a dynamic universe than Einstein himself. With the help of a man named Hubble, the famous telescope
guy who didn’t believe in an expanding universe either, he proved that a
distant nebula was in fact moving away from us. This was in 1929, before
iPhones were invented.
But
that was not all. Lemaitre also came up with the theory of the Big Bang – back
then, called the Primeval Atom. Not bad for a Catholic priest.
So
what was left to discover? Black holes, of course. Even though the idea of a
black hole was hypothesized way back in 1783, they were only
"proven" over the course of the 20th century. Black holes are so dense that they suck everything in, even light, which makes them hard to see.
Then came along a man named Stephen Hawking, the focus of this book I'm about halfway through. Stricken by a crippling disease at a young age that left him physically immobile, it never affected his brilliant mind nor his ability to have kids (just thought I’d throw that in there). He proved that black holes were not just sucking everything in, but also spewing out "information" or, as I like to call it, black hole spit up. Hawking radiation is now the official term.
Interestingly,
he also suggested that one plus one may not equal two in a black hole… and, if
you carry the one, it might actually slip out of the black hole – you know, as radiation. I made that last part up, but the bottom line is that our understanding of
general relativity, as we know it, may not exist as you enter a black hole, the
so-called point of no return.
Hawking
drew parallels with black holes and the Big Bang, which may or may not hold water. It’s difficult to prove something, after all, that happened 13.8 billion
years ago. There were no cameras back then.
He
theorized that the laws of physics evolved over time. In a very short time,
like the first milli-milliseconds of our universe’s existence, everything changed.
Just as the laws of physics break down in a black hole, so too did they “break
down” in the very instant when the universe began.
I
may or may not be describing these concepts correctly, but feel free to read
the first half of the book to prove me wrong.
It's waiting in the library.