Friday, 4 April 2025

Free will or not, the train made me do it

  

Did I have any other choice but to stop for ice cream on the way home last Monday night? 

I sincerely believe – at least this is what I tell my wife – there was a clear sequence of events that made it unavoidable. First, there was the train. On my way home, I saw the train lights in the distance and so I took a detour that would bypass the train tracks entirely. While on that detour, I realized, subconsciously, that I had rhubarb-apple crisp at home that could not be eaten without ice cream. And while we had some ice cream at home, it was not vanilla, and as we all know, vanilla ice creamand vanilla ice cream alone must be eaten with rhubarb-apple crisp. 

And so my detour of my detour led me to Safeway, where I found a non-brand name vanilla ice cream on sale which was acceptable given the exorbitant price of brand name ice cream. As it turned out, this non-brand name ice cream was on par in texture and taste with the finest of brand name ice creamsat almost half the price! 

Now I ask you, how could I have not made this purchase? Did I have free will in any of this? (Yes, this is a philosophical discussion.) 

I’m not asking whether I had a choice. Of course I had a choice. Even once at the store, I could have chosen to not buy the ice cream. What if, for instance, there was only brand name ice cream and I refused, out of principle (let’s just pretend), to pay the exorbitantly high price?  

Or what if I was suddenly overcome with feelings of self-control, enabling me to exercise willpower that I have yet to experience in my lifetime when it comes to matters of ice cream? 

What if there was no train? 

These what ifs are fun to entertain in hindsight, but we know none of them can be. The past is what it is, and as many times as you replay the tape, the sequence of events remains the same. I’m buying the non-brand name vanilla ice cream. 

 You might think I’m trying to excuse my behaviour. But I'd be the first to own my actions and, while I can’t change the past, I understand that I can choose differently in the future. If I thought that ice cream was somehow bad for me, let's just say, then I could make life changes to ensure this never happens again 

Let's be clear: Our actions are not without consequence simply because free will may not exist. But, as Robert Sapolsky argues in his book, Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will, our lives are impacted by a chain of events that are largely beyond our control. 

It starts at birth. Your gender, race, parents, and socio-economic status are not yours to decide, nor where and when you were born. We prefer to think everyone has equal opportunity in our free society, and in many cases, they do. But it doesn’t take much to understand, that as a child of an alcoholic, particularly during pregnancy, one will be set back for life. Even if you’re lucky enough to not be born with the irreversible condition of fetal alcohol syndrome, being the child of an alcoholic will make you more prone to addiction and reduce your chance of success later in life. 

What Sapolsky argues is that a long list of factors beyond our control (genetics included) can set us up for success or failure. And while you might think we can't blame anyone but ourselves growing up in Canada (which I still think is faulty thinking), what if you were instead born in the slums of Bangladesh? Luck-of-the-draw “birth benefits” like nationality, family wealth and intelligence can lead one on an entirely different life trajectory. 

They will likely lead to what we deem modern-day success. Yes, hard work is also part of the formula. But what drives people to work hard? Culture, family, and genetics all play a role. For some people, their brains' neurons fire most excitedly when they challenge themselves over and over again to succeed, no matter how many times they fail!

Again, I’m not excusing sloth or greed or gluttony (my love for ice cream included) or any of the seven deadly sins. As humans, we still need to be held accountable for our actions. 

But it’s an interesting exercise to think about your life and who you are how you became who you are and then think, how could it possibly have been any different?

 

Saturday, 29 March 2025

A portrait worth a thousand lifted sanctions

  

If you’ve seen the portrait that Donald Trump couldn’t stop complaining about in the Colorado State Capitol, you'll likely agree. It’s one of the poorest portrayals of the man ever created. It’s not even a caricature, which would have at least made it amusing. It simply doesn't look like him – perhaps instead a first cousin? 

One thing I’m sure of: The portrait Vladimir Putin commissioned of Trump will be more refined. Judging by the tone of Trump’s sycophant, Steve Whitkoff, as he described the chummy two-hour talk between Putin and Trump last week, it's a painting fit for a king (with gold plated frame or perhaps even gold painted?) And why wouldn’t Putin pay top dollar? Through this painting, he could unleash billions of dollars in Russian exports. Three years of American sanctions could disappear with one simple gift.  

Oh yes, and by ceasing military aggression in Ukraine. This is obviously secondary, if it can even be called aggression by the White House anymore. After all, it takes two sides to fight a war, doesn’t it? By TrumpPutin’s account (we might as well combine their names as their views tend to meld into one), Ukraine antagonized Russia by expressing a desire to join NATO. Why Ukraine, a country already illegally annexed by Russia in the Crimea and eastern Donbas, would ever fear Russia might attack them, I haven’t the slightest clue. 

The discourse in the U.S. is not yet pro-Russia but, thanks to Trump, it’s becoming more Russia friendly. Not only does he have media empires like Fox News to echo his upside-down worldview, he has Elon Musk, Minister of Propaganda (i.e. owner of X). Incredibly, Musk performs this duty in addition to his role as Minister of Destruction of Government Entirely (i.e. DOGE). Other prominent influencers, like podcaster Joe Rogan, are now repeating Russian talking points based on articles written by Putin himself. 

It used to be that when Putin spoke, the public immediately discounted his speech as lies. As soon as he invaded Ukraine (the second time), he lost all credibility entirely. Now Trump is giving it back... on a silver platter. To a war criminal. Although one wonders how long Putin, like Trump, will be viewed by the worldled by a growing group of autocratic thugs – as guilty of anything. As we heard in the Oval Office meeting with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which was chilling but perhaps not surprising, Trump views Putin as a victim.

Already Putin’s war crimes are being swept under the rug. The Trump administration recently cut off funding to Yale University’s Humanitarian Research Lab that was compiling a database of alleged Russian war crimes, including the abduction of 35,000 children from occupied Ukraine. The U.S. State Department cut off all access to this database, which not only hampers the prosecution of Putin by the International Criminal Court but hinders efforts to get Ukrainian children back to their families in Ukraine. Only due to Congressional pressure has the State Department temporarily restored some of the funding this past week. It's not clear if the evidence has been deleted or tampered with.

This is typical TrumpPutin behaviour. Like two mob bosses, they’ve staked out their territory (in their mind, this includes Ukraine, Greenland, Canada...), together sharing an autocratic kinship divided only by a European sea of inconvenient democratic norms and laws. 

It’s terrible for the world, but particularly bad for Ukraine. Until Europe gets fully involved – with less talk and more military action – I fear that Ukraine will be the first of many to become America’s crumbling collateral damage. 

But it will be one beautiful portrait. 


The Coloradan Masterpiece